Team batting first | Team batting second | |||
Wickets lost (w) | Z0(w) | b(w) | Z0(w) | b(w) |
0 | 297.16 | .034005 | 560.83 | .010787 |
1 | 252.09 | .040588 | 469.11 | .012625 |
2 | 219.99 | .046460 | 386.49 | .015409 |
3 | 180.47 | .057669 | 294.09 | .020311 |
4 | 144.83 | .074333 | 201.23 | .030664 |
5 | 108.16 | .092476 | 136.01 | .044826 |
6 | 85.494 | .12285 | 109.01 | .044826 |
7 | 49.176 | .22613 | 67.961 | .064166 |
8 | 28.113 | .32446 | 42.509 | .10788 |
9 | 13.027 | .56227 | 18.205 | .14941 |
Duckworth-Lewis method for the live cricket is the very much controversial mathematical way to calculate the target score for the team batting second in a one-day cricket. It is used to generate the result of the matches when interrupted by the some f the circumstances or by weather (generally by weather).Often known as D/L in the name of cricket is also used for the generating even the conclusions of the match.
THEORY OF Duckworth-Lewis--
The theory of D/L is totally depended on the combination of resources which are as follows-
1--runs.
2--innings.
3--wickets
4--over
For the calculations from the table given, the percentage
of the resources are calculated of the over, left out wickets.
These percentage calculates the target for the second team.
If also the match score is tied, that match score is declared
As a tied match.
In the first table the average innings by a team batting first was 238.7 runs (235 - (-3.7)) and the teams batting second averaged 232.4 runs (235 - 2.6).
Team batting first | Team batting second | |||||||
Overs Completed | D/L minus actual | Standard Deviation | Pre-2002 D/L minus actual | Innings | D/L minus actual | Standard Deviation | Pre-2002 D/L minus actual | Innings |
0 | -3.7 | 60.3 | -13.7 | 650 | 2.6 | 57.0 | -7.4 | 599 |
5 | -5.5 | 54.5 | -14.4 | 650 | 1.6 | 50.7 | -7.2 | 597 |
10 | -6.0 | 48.4 | -13.5 | 650 | 2.5 | 44.7 | -5.2 | 595 |
15 | -5.6 | 42.2 | -11.2 | 650 | 4.1 | 39.5 | -2.4 | 590 |
20 | -6.2 | 37.3 | -10.0 | 647 | 4.7 | 35.3 | -0.5 | 575 |
25 | -6.9 | 32.3 | -8.9 | 645 | 5.8 | 32.3 | 1.8 | 552 |
30 | -5.6 | 28.6 | -6.1 | 645 | 5.4 | 26.8 | 2.6 | 528 |
35 | -6.5 | 24.2 | -5.8 | 631 | 4.9 | 23.3 | 3.2 | 492 |
40 | -7.0 | 19.8 | -5.5 | 615 | 3.5 | 18.3 | 2.7 | 441 |
45 | -5.7 | 12.9 | -4.2 | 587 | 2.0 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 345 |
46 | -4.8 | 11.4 | -3.4 | 579 | 1.8 | 10.0 | 1.8 | 303 |
47 | -3.9 | 9.4 | -2.7 | 571 | 1.5 | 8.3 | 1.6 | 270 |
48 | -2.7 | 7.3 | -1.8 | 555 | 0.9 | 6.7 | 1.0 | 216 |
49 | -1.6 | 5.0 | -1.2 | 524 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 147 |
Many of the times this method of generating the result could generate some impossible scores, even very fortunate to go on it, but at the same time cricket is the game of un predictions.
No comments:
Post a Comment